{"content":{"sharePage":{"page":0,"digests":[{"id":"65686794","dateCreated":"1389802682","smartDate":"Jan 15, 2014","userCreated":{"username":"juniuswright","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/juniuswright","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/pic\/1226023806\/juniuswright-lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/karliecradock.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/65686794"},"dateDigested":1532390420,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Mr. Wright feedback","description":"Majority of the arguments are clearly presented.
\nThe majority of the paragraphs are unified with their topic sentence and the thesis statement.
\nThesis statement states the argument and how it will be presented.
\n30 points.
\n
\nQuotations and examples of indirect characterization from the play are correctly used throughout all areas of the essay as supporting evidence. Supporting evidence is properly introduced and or documented.
\nAll of the support is logically aligned with the argument it supports.
\n30 points.
\n
\nLiterary tools are not used or incorrectly used to analyze the support. Explains how the analysis results support the arguments in most areas of the essay.
\n25 out of 30 points.
\n
\nGrammar, spelling, and mechanical errors do not disrupt communication in any area.
\n
\n95 out of 100 points total.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]}],"more":false},"comments":[]},"http":{"code":200,"status":"OK"},"redirectUrl":null,"javascript":null,"notices":{"warning":[],"error":[],"info":[],"success":[]}}